I guess the VIA application process has been taking longer than I thought so there haven't been that many changes since my last post. However, with my new Facebook account there's suddenly a lot of people claiming to care about where I'm at. So here's my effort to satisfy you all.
I'm still in Michigan living with my parents. Yep, 25, living in Mom and Dad's basement, and watching lots of movies and TV. Living the nerds dream!
Seriously though, I've been working on returning to Kenya and possibly traveling around East Africa with WGM as a VIA. I've sent in my application and just today have been told I've been approved by Head Quarters. Next step is getting approval from the Kenya field missionaries, all my "aunts and uncles" I'm a shoe in. Then we have to work out a budget and other details, I'll have to raise support and then eventually I'll be getting out of Michigan.
In the meantime, I'm cashiering etc. at Meijer here in Grand Rapids. Don't particularly care for it, but it pays.
I'm also working as a freelance Videographer in my free time. Right now I'm getting started editing one of my biggest projects ever, the Hollow Rock camp video. It's a promo for a Holiness Camp in Ohio. I shot 10 hours of footage back in July and now I'm sorting through it and sifting out the bad stuff.
And I guess that's a semi-decent update on where I'm at and what I'm up to.
Friday, November 16, 2007
Monday, September 24, 2007
A shift in Blogorities
Well if anyone was ever reading this blog, they probably wondered what happened to that guy who never really said anything. The truth is I just ran out of things to not say. However my life is starting to take a turn in a new direction, so I think now I will have things to say. No longer will this blog be all about movies and such nonsense. You could say I've had a shift in Blogorities.
In July I talked to a missionary friend from Kenya. He mentioned that World Gospel Mission (WGM) in East Africa, along with the national Africa Gospel Church (AGC) are in need of a video person to help let various AGC congregations know what their AGC missionaries are up to. My response was "Hey sign me up."
This time that I've been living in Michigan working as a cashier my plan has been to find that job that would help me learn a bit more about video production and then some day move into missionary service. For over two years now that goal has not been working out, except for this past several months where I've been able to do some freelance work out of my house. So for the past while I've been thinking that I should start looking into skipping that first step and see about getting into mission work now. I had been putting off the move in part because I thought I may finally have a job lining up. However when this missionary friend (John Muelhiesen) presented me with work in Africa my heart jumped in a way that made me say "Now is the time."
With this new goal in mind I pushed to see if my other job opportunity would work out, it was going to be a six month internship at a church. However, God finally closed that door and locked it just as I was making contact with various people about this possibility of going back to Kenya.
There are a lot of details to work out still and I have to finish my application, but I am very excited about this prospect. I'm looking at it as the spring board for moving into full time missions, weather or not things in East Africa pan out to a full time ministry position, it would help me realize what I still need to learn, and what applications there could be for media ministries through out the world.
At this point I know there's probably few people who will stumble upon this blog and care about any of this. However, once I get some details nailed down and get out a support letter I will let many loved ones know about this blog. In preparation for that day let me say now "Thank you to all of you who have loved me and supported me through out my life. And thank you for your prayers and support in this latest endeavor."
In July I talked to a missionary friend from Kenya. He mentioned that World Gospel Mission (WGM) in East Africa, along with the national Africa Gospel Church (AGC) are in need of a video person to help let various AGC congregations know what their AGC missionaries are up to. My response was "Hey sign me up."
This time that I've been living in Michigan working as a cashier my plan has been to find that job that would help me learn a bit more about video production and then some day move into missionary service. For over two years now that goal has not been working out, except for this past several months where I've been able to do some freelance work out of my house. So for the past while I've been thinking that I should start looking into skipping that first step and see about getting into mission work now. I had been putting off the move in part because I thought I may finally have a job lining up. However when this missionary friend (John Muelhiesen) presented me with work in Africa my heart jumped in a way that made me say "Now is the time."
With this new goal in mind I pushed to see if my other job opportunity would work out, it was going to be a six month internship at a church. However, God finally closed that door and locked it just as I was making contact with various people about this possibility of going back to Kenya.
There are a lot of details to work out still and I have to finish my application, but I am very excited about this prospect. I'm looking at it as the spring board for moving into full time missions, weather or not things in East Africa pan out to a full time ministry position, it would help me realize what I still need to learn, and what applications there could be for media ministries through out the world.
At this point I know there's probably few people who will stumble upon this blog and care about any of this. However, once I get some details nailed down and get out a support letter I will let many loved ones know about this blog. In preparation for that day let me say now "Thank you to all of you who have loved me and supported me through out my life. And thank you for your prayers and support in this latest endeavor."
Monday, April 2, 2007
Guilty Pleasures
I love movies, I love DVDs. My major joy in the world of DVDs is actually not in the higher-than-VHS quality of the viewing, it's not in the anamorphic widescreen, and it's not even in the added convenience of how much space is taken up by a DVD disc as compared to a VHS tape. No my favorite part of a DVD is called the "Special features" with documentaries by HBO or E!, or even Peter Jackson running around with a DV cam saying this field will some day be Hobbiton, director commentaries, gag reels, deleted scenes, and step by step how to create and animate your very own CG Yoda (if only you had the computer software and memory we have). I love it all! I can literally spend hours watching the bonous features of a movie just to get a feel for how different people work, why do I like a particular film (or dislike it), and just so when I'm at a party I can say "I know how they did that effect" and sound like a movie genius myself.
So what? Why do you care how little of a life I have? Well, occasionally when I'm watching the bonus features on a DVD I will hear some one say that "that one shot cost us XXXX amount of dollars and YYY hours of work. But I think it was worth it." My question is was it really? I mean was it worth thousands of dollars and hundreds of hours work to transform a shepherds field into a village where a bunch of little people live for a couple weeks and then transform it back to just any field in the end? Think if instead Peter Jackson had told his friends "we are going to build a small town and let the poor and hungry people in New Zealand move into it and start their own businesses with some money we'll loan them." Assuming this was a successful venture, how would the lives of a couple hundred Kiwis be different today. How would your life be different? So what's the greater good? Now to take it more personal. What if having seen The Fellowship of the Ring in the theater and falling instantly in love with all things Tolkien I had eagerly awaited the release of the Extended Edition DVD, but at the last minute had instead put that $30 into a charity to feed a starving family in Africa for a month. How would their lives be better? How would mine be worse?
The difficult truth is that if PJ had not made LOTR my life would only be slightly different. My favorite movie would still be Star Wars, the Classic Trilogy (I know they are 3 movies, but they are best together as one), and I probably still would not have read any of Tolkien's books. That's about it, and if I had not bought the Rings trilogy on DVD, well there would have been 48 hours of commentary watching alone in the last 6 months that I would have done something else with. And that African family would have been able to eat well in a time where instead they fought famine and disease, they would have clean water, a milk cow, and goats to slaughter for the occasional celebration or even to sell the meat in town.
I suppose I am just having trouble with the concept that there are those in the world who have real needs that I could help with and instead last night I spent $15 on a Killers CD and $10 on a bag of coffee imported from Ethiopia. To the poor people who picked those beans $10 is probably at least a weeks salary.
That being said, I also believe that while God expects us to be good and compassionate stewards with the gifts he has bestowed on us, he also expects us to be able to enjoy the world around us. Thus there is nothing wrong with buying a new DVD or CD to bless brief periods of your life, but do so while keeping in mind God's call to reach out to those around you. Do not store up for yourself treasures on earth (don't take your DVD collection to the extreme of having EVERY movie ever made) at the expense of eternal heavenly treasures. As with many things in the life of a Christian it is just a balancing act, though the more you lean towards charity really can't hurt you.
So what? Why do you care how little of a life I have? Well, occasionally when I'm watching the bonus features on a DVD I will hear some one say that "that one shot cost us XXXX amount of dollars and YYY hours of work. But I think it was worth it." My question is was it really? I mean was it worth thousands of dollars and hundreds of hours work to transform a shepherds field into a village where a bunch of little people live for a couple weeks and then transform it back to just any field in the end? Think if instead Peter Jackson had told his friends "we are going to build a small town and let the poor and hungry people in New Zealand move into it and start their own businesses with some money we'll loan them." Assuming this was a successful venture, how would the lives of a couple hundred Kiwis be different today. How would your life be different? So what's the greater good? Now to take it more personal. What if having seen The Fellowship of the Ring in the theater and falling instantly in love with all things Tolkien I had eagerly awaited the release of the Extended Edition DVD, but at the last minute had instead put that $30 into a charity to feed a starving family in Africa for a month. How would their lives be better? How would mine be worse?
The difficult truth is that if PJ had not made LOTR my life would only be slightly different. My favorite movie would still be Star Wars, the Classic Trilogy (I know they are 3 movies, but they are best together as one), and I probably still would not have read any of Tolkien's books. That's about it, and if I had not bought the Rings trilogy on DVD, well there would have been 48 hours of commentary watching alone in the last 6 months that I would have done something else with. And that African family would have been able to eat well in a time where instead they fought famine and disease, they would have clean water, a milk cow, and goats to slaughter for the occasional celebration or even to sell the meat in town.
I suppose I am just having trouble with the concept that there are those in the world who have real needs that I could help with and instead last night I spent $15 on a Killers CD and $10 on a bag of coffee imported from Ethiopia. To the poor people who picked those beans $10 is probably at least a weeks salary.
That being said, I also believe that while God expects us to be good and compassionate stewards with the gifts he has bestowed on us, he also expects us to be able to enjoy the world around us. Thus there is nothing wrong with buying a new DVD or CD to bless brief periods of your life, but do so while keeping in mind God's call to reach out to those around you. Do not store up for yourself treasures on earth (don't take your DVD collection to the extreme of having EVERY movie ever made) at the expense of eternal heavenly treasures. As with many things in the life of a Christian it is just a balancing act, though the more you lean towards charity really can't hurt you.
Tuesday, March 20, 2007
R rated Christian
This past weekend I had the opportunity to watch a film I've been wanting to see for about 2 years now. The film is To End All Wars featuring Kieffer Sutherland and was released back in 2001. Anyway the reason I wanted to see the movie is that I had to read the book during my Sr. year or college. In fact I have to give a lot of credit to Earnest Gordon as being the author who got me back into reading. Something strange happened as I was reading that book for my leadership class, I found myself actually enjoying it!
To quickly summarize the story is about Earnest Gordon a Scottish soldier who served the crown in the pacific during WWII. The book begins with some back story and tells about his daring attempt to escape by sea at the fall of Sumatra into Japanese hands, but in the end he was captured by the Japanese. This is where the movie, and the main story of the book, begins. Gordon is taken to a prison camp in the jungles of Asia. While in the camp he nearly dies of malaria and dysentery but is saved by the efforts of 2 other prisoners. This is a key point as at this time all the other prisoners were only looking out for themselves. The kindness shown him leads Gordon to find God in the prison camp, he then looks at the camp and decides to try and help his fellows understand that the only way any of them will survive is by looking out for one another. To do this Gordon starts a "Jungle University" where the men can study and discuss Plato, Shakespeare, Religion, and eventually even music and art. More and more prisoners in the camp come to know Christ through the experiences started by Gordon and his 2 pals, but things are not all good either. The Japanese still inflict terrible injustices and beatings on the men, and even crucify one of Gordon's friends. Also the camp is not all about studies, as the prisoners are forced to build the infamous "Railroad of Death."
So what am I talking about here? What's this got to do with the title of this post? Well as I popped the DVD into my player the other night and sat down to see the story come to life on my TV screen a familiar warning popped up... "This film is rated R and is meant for mature audiences." Now I've seen lots of R rated movies and have no problem with the idea that I'll watch more in the future. But the question that came to me on this occasion was "can a Christian make an R rated film?"
The church generally frowns upon showing any film with a rating above PG, and even that is pushing it some times. So how can a person following Jesus direct a film that will merit an R rating? All this was raised by To End All Wars and so after watching the movie I tried checking out the DVD features to see if any issues of faith were mentioned. The Director, David Cunningham, never really mentioned much about the story of Gordon's faith and in fact his faith is underplayed in the movie which focuses more on the ideals that came from it, the school, the forgiveness, and the sacrifices. This leads me to believe that Cunningham believes in the humanitarian ideals shared in the book but lacks the personal faith in Christ that Gordon found in that situation, though I pray I'm wrong and have no solid evidence either way.
So how about it, can a Christian make an R rated film? I believe they can, not every aspect of life is meant for all audiences. The realities of war, rape, and prison are things that we want to protect our children from until they are mature enough to understand. And yet they are not subjects that we as Christians should avoid all together. My favorite part of the book To End All Wars was the aspect of finding faith in the most dire of circumstances. However, even with this great aspect to the story line it is not a book for a five-year-old to read, there is a lot of death, brutal beatings, a brief mention of women who are sex slaves to the Japanese soldiers, and, as I mentioned before, even a crucifixion. If the book is not meant for a five-year-old how could the movie meet that audience?
We all know we live in a flawed world and our rating system is no exception. The MPAA is the organization that sets the ratings in the US and according to their website the requirements for an R rating are...
strong language
violence
nudity
drug abuse
or a combination of the above
Looking at the list with no context of a story we begin to ask how can we justify making a film with these elements and claiming it as kingdom work? However, if you look at stories like To End All Wars, to gain any kind of realism there is going to be strong language and violence. How about a story of the drug dealer who finds Christ through some unique circumstance? You can't possibly make a believable drug dealer with out any drug abuse. It's true that nudity is a bit harder to justify with out subbing porn star for drug dealer in my previous example , but consider the portrayal of concentration camps in Schindler's List where Jews were forced to strip down and run around to show the Nazi's how healthy they were.
My final argument came to me when I had stepped away from To End All Wars. Consider a film that was released a few years ago, Mel Gibson's The Passion of the Christ. Depicting the very struggles our Lord went through to bring us the forgiveness we so desperately needed and so easily take for granted, the Passion quite deserved it's R rating due to the amount of blood spilled.
In conclusion, I think it is important to carefully consider what stories merit the high ratings and why specifically, but I think the R rating is something that we as Christians should not necessarily fear. Who cares what label the world puts on our story, the real issue is can we make an excellent picture that tells an important story?
To quickly summarize the story is about Earnest Gordon a Scottish soldier who served the crown in the pacific during WWII. The book begins with some back story and tells about his daring attempt to escape by sea at the fall of Sumatra into Japanese hands, but in the end he was captured by the Japanese. This is where the movie, and the main story of the book, begins. Gordon is taken to a prison camp in the jungles of Asia. While in the camp he nearly dies of malaria and dysentery but is saved by the efforts of 2 other prisoners. This is a key point as at this time all the other prisoners were only looking out for themselves. The kindness shown him leads Gordon to find God in the prison camp, he then looks at the camp and decides to try and help his fellows understand that the only way any of them will survive is by looking out for one another. To do this Gordon starts a "Jungle University" where the men can study and discuss Plato, Shakespeare, Religion, and eventually even music and art. More and more prisoners in the camp come to know Christ through the experiences started by Gordon and his 2 pals, but things are not all good either. The Japanese still inflict terrible injustices and beatings on the men, and even crucify one of Gordon's friends. Also the camp is not all about studies, as the prisoners are forced to build the infamous "Railroad of Death."
So what am I talking about here? What's this got to do with the title of this post? Well as I popped the DVD into my player the other night and sat down to see the story come to life on my TV screen a familiar warning popped up... "This film is rated R and is meant for mature audiences." Now I've seen lots of R rated movies and have no problem with the idea that I'll watch more in the future. But the question that came to me on this occasion was "can a Christian make an R rated film?"
The church generally frowns upon showing any film with a rating above PG, and even that is pushing it some times. So how can a person following Jesus direct a film that will merit an R rating? All this was raised by To End All Wars and so after watching the movie I tried checking out the DVD features to see if any issues of faith were mentioned. The Director, David Cunningham, never really mentioned much about the story of Gordon's faith and in fact his faith is underplayed in the movie which focuses more on the ideals that came from it, the school, the forgiveness, and the sacrifices. This leads me to believe that Cunningham believes in the humanitarian ideals shared in the book but lacks the personal faith in Christ that Gordon found in that situation, though I pray I'm wrong and have no solid evidence either way.
So how about it, can a Christian make an R rated film? I believe they can, not every aspect of life is meant for all audiences. The realities of war, rape, and prison are things that we want to protect our children from until they are mature enough to understand. And yet they are not subjects that we as Christians should avoid all together. My favorite part of the book To End All Wars was the aspect of finding faith in the most dire of circumstances. However, even with this great aspect to the story line it is not a book for a five-year-old to read, there is a lot of death, brutal beatings, a brief mention of women who are sex slaves to the Japanese soldiers, and, as I mentioned before, even a crucifixion. If the book is not meant for a five-year-old how could the movie meet that audience?
We all know we live in a flawed world and our rating system is no exception. The MPAA is the organization that sets the ratings in the US and according to their website the requirements for an R rating are...
strong language
violence
nudity
drug abuse
or a combination of the above
Looking at the list with no context of a story we begin to ask how can we justify making a film with these elements and claiming it as kingdom work? However, if you look at stories like To End All Wars, to gain any kind of realism there is going to be strong language and violence. How about a story of the drug dealer who finds Christ through some unique circumstance? You can't possibly make a believable drug dealer with out any drug abuse. It's true that nudity is a bit harder to justify with out subbing porn star for drug dealer in my previous example , but consider the portrayal of concentration camps in Schindler's List where Jews were forced to strip down and run around to show the Nazi's how healthy they were.
My final argument came to me when I had stepped away from To End All Wars. Consider a film that was released a few years ago, Mel Gibson's The Passion of the Christ. Depicting the very struggles our Lord went through to bring us the forgiveness we so desperately needed and so easily take for granted, the Passion quite deserved it's R rating due to the amount of blood spilled.
In conclusion, I think it is important to carefully consider what stories merit the high ratings and why specifically, but I think the R rating is something that we as Christians should not necessarily fear. Who cares what label the world puts on our story, the real issue is can we make an excellent picture that tells an important story?
Thursday, March 15, 2007
The First Babbling...
What can I say, I've given in to the blogging phenom. Really I probably have no license to be doing this as I've only really read like 3 blogs in my life. Two of those are by friends of mine who have all kinds of exciting stuff going on in their lives so of course they have a lot to write about. The other was once I read a couple blog entries by a guy in Uganda who was saying that the best way to keep Africa from destroying itself was to reinstate colonization and have the white man take it over. (Let me clarify that he is a black Ugandan so it's not some racist thing of saving Africa from the Africans) Anyway, my point in all this is that I feel somewhat like I don't have a lot to offer to those who may stumble upon and read my blog. There isn't currently a lot going on in my life, and I don't know that I have any opinions that are quite as strong and interesting as colonizing the third world.
Still I do have a brain that thinks about stuff, and as I get dressed each day or find myself alone in my car I do have a tendency to ramble on to myself about what's wrong with the world, or why Spielberg and Tim Burton are great directors, or how life would be better if blah blah blah. And really I suppose this meets the minimum requirements for a blog. I can find something to go on and on about and think that maybe someone cares enough to read it. But still even if no one cares to read it, I'm not depending on this for an income like a newspaper columnist, and I'm not paying out anything for the chance to share my views with anyone who accidentally stumbles upon it.
That's the beauty of the blog... it doesn't matter if you care what I have to say or not, it's our constitutional amendment of free speech at its best. I can say anything on here and no one can hunt me down because I put almost nothing in my portfolio. It's like I have a soap box in the town square and I can speak my mind with out the fear that one of you has just bought a box of rotten tomatoes at a discount price in preparation for just such an occasion.
So where am I going here? Is this really going to be a blog about blogging? Why is there always someone who brings vegetables to a speech?
Where I'm going is to say that this is just an introduction to me and my blog, if you already don't like it don't bother coming back because it will probably never get any better. It's also my way of introducing myself to the concept of blogging, so no I'm not ALWAYS going to blog on blogging, but this turned into kind of an interesting entry I think. And someone has to bring veggies to a speech because otherwise we'd end up throwing chairs and have nothing to sit on.
Still I do have a brain that thinks about stuff, and as I get dressed each day or find myself alone in my car I do have a tendency to ramble on to myself about what's wrong with the world, or why Spielberg and Tim Burton are great directors, or how life would be better if blah blah blah. And really I suppose this meets the minimum requirements for a blog. I can find something to go on and on about and think that maybe someone cares enough to read it. But still even if no one cares to read it, I'm not depending on this for an income like a newspaper columnist, and I'm not paying out anything for the chance to share my views with anyone who accidentally stumbles upon it.
That's the beauty of the blog... it doesn't matter if you care what I have to say or not, it's our constitutional amendment of free speech at its best. I can say anything on here and no one can hunt me down because I put almost nothing in my portfolio. It's like I have a soap box in the town square and I can speak my mind with out the fear that one of you has just bought a box of rotten tomatoes at a discount price in preparation for just such an occasion.
So where am I going here? Is this really going to be a blog about blogging? Why is there always someone who brings vegetables to a speech?
Where I'm going is to say that this is just an introduction to me and my blog, if you already don't like it don't bother coming back because it will probably never get any better. It's also my way of introducing myself to the concept of blogging, so no I'm not ALWAYS going to blog on blogging, but this turned into kind of an interesting entry I think. And someone has to bring veggies to a speech because otherwise we'd end up throwing chairs and have nothing to sit on.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)